Can Biotech and Organic Crops Coexist?
Date: 28.6.2006
Don Cameron paints a rainbow of agricultural diversity on his Terranova Ranch in Helm, Calif. He plants his 5,500 acres with biotech, organic and conventional crops — yet goes to great lengths to keep them separate.
"We have to isolate crops because of possible pollen drifts, regardless of being biotech, organic or conventional," Cameron says.
With the rising popularity of biotech and organic crops, Cameron is one of a growing number of farmers who care about segregating their plantings. Economics largely drives their concerns. Biotech crops are often hardier, generating higher yields per acre than their organic or even conventionally grown counterparts. Meanwhile, thanks to consumer demand, organically produced crops can bring a significant premium for growers — sometimes three or more times the value of conventionally grown crops.
Can biotech and organic crops coexist without biotech material finding its way into organic plants, compromising their economic value? What practices do farmers follow to maintain the integrity of organic and genetically enhanced crops?
What Does "Certified" Mean?
Many consumers and farmers take the term organic very seriously. In 2002, the U.S. Department of Agriculture prohibited biotech ingredients from products sold under the "USDA Organic" seal. Yet even before biotech crops entered the American marketplace in 1995, many organic farmers, manufacturers and consumers became concerned about organic purity due to the potential effects of wind-blown pollen, and the unintentional commingling of different seeds and other accidental happenings.
Just how does the USDA certify products as organic? The department has accredited agents who certify that products bearing the official organic seal follow production and handling standards and practices that the USDA National Organics Standards Board has approved. The standards are process-based. For example, say that food bearing an organic seal accidentally becomes exposed to residue from a genetically modified organism or synthetic pesticide that conventional farmers use. The farmer who produced the food would not have to worry about losing organic accreditation providing he or she followed the USDA production methods.
"Growers should understand that they get paid for production protection and not for purity," says Professor Drew L. Kershen, an agricultural law expert at the University of Oklahoma College of Law.
Isolating Crops
Farmers and farm communities employ many tactics to maximize purity levels of seeds. Some farmers voluntarily practice one production method, planting only organic or only biotech crops. Others may have acreage with biotech, organic and conventional crops but strive to keep them separate.
Farmers isolate crops in a variety of ways. Jim Petersen, who farms 600 acres in Knoxville, Iowa, leaves a 25-foot buffer area to separate the organic maize and soy he grows from conventional and biotech crops. Farmers can plant such a swath with a different crop or, more commonly, sow different crops on either side of a road.
Such a buffer policy also comes into play between farms as well. Boulder County, Colo., for example, has instituted a "good-neighbor" policy for lessees of its parkland, encouraging farmers to keep each other informed and to make cooperative decisions regarding plantings.
Cameron says that he and his neighbors, too, let each other know when, what and where they're planting. He also staggers his plantings so that they pollinate at different times, and he rotates different crops in different years.
Cameron typically plants alfalfa, corn, cotton, grapes, herbs, oat hay, onions, seed crops, tomatoes and walnuts — about 10 percent of which is certified organic. He has planted biotech alfalfa and cotton and is considering planting biotech corn.
"We haven't had any problems," says Cameron, who takes even more care to protect crops from commingling. "We have to make sure we keep the seed separate when we plant. We have to clean our planter so that we don't have any [biotech] seed ending up in an organic cotton field. We have to be more diligent at planting time and also at harvest time. We want to make sure that we keep everything totally separate."
Some communities have taken more drastic steps to isolate biotech, organic and conventional crops. Beginning in March 2004 with California's Mendocino County, some areas have voted to ban biotech farming within their borders. Others have rejected such bans based on the belief that it limits farmers' ability to choose between safe production methods — the latest being California's Sonoma County in a November 2005 ballot measure. In areas that permit both methods, neighboring farms may have organic and biotech versions of the same crop in adjoining fields.
Coexistence: A Familiar Challenge for Farmers
The issue of coexistence predates the introduction of biotechnology. The ease of cross-pollination can compromise the purity of all types of seeds — in the field and beyond. Consider supply streams. Seeds and plant material can inadvertently mix during transportation. And they can commingle at local elevators, processing plants and other facilities that house and handle organic, biotech and conventional material at different times — or even simultaneously.
While the coexistence of biotechnology and organic farming has received much attention of late, farmers, producers and consumers can rest assured knowing that previous generations successfully addressed the challenges of other forms of coexistence. According to the International Seed Federation, which represents the seed industry: "The farming community and the seed industry have a long history of growing different crops side-by-side and producing pure seed stocks."
Related articles
Biotech Acres: Global Biotech Plantings Show Double-Digit Growth for 10th Straight Year - Biotech farm crops grew in 2006 by 13 percent over the previous year — the 10th straight year of double-digit increases, according to a new report from the nonprofit International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) (18.4.2007)
